A study of standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Our institutional experience

نویسندگان

چکیده

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered to be the standard procedure in patients with large renal calculus. The purpose of this study analyze evidence-based literature regarding “nephrostomy-free” or “tubeless” PCNL and assess safety, efficacy, possibility, benefits tubeless over PCNL. Aims Objectives: aim was review compare Materials Methods: It a retrospective done between August 2021 December 2022. 100 cases stone disease size more than 2 cm who underwent Department Urology, Govt hospital, Salem. Patients are divided into two groups (Group A Group B) 50 each depending on date surgery. Results: In our study, we compared versus disease. Tubeless performed success age 13 years–65 years. 36 were female patients, whereas 64 male study. All results presented tabulated form Conclusion: safe effective technique associated decreased pain, low analgesic requirement, less operating time, faster recovery. However, it has its own limitation that precludes secondary for treatment, removal internal stent, dysuria, need visit hospital subsequent stent.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE To prospectively compare the outcome of standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SmPCNL) versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TmPCNL) as primary treatments of renal stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 80 patients with a solitary radio-opaque renal stone and candidates for PCNL were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40, one group treate...

متن کامل

Standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE This article systematically analyses comparative studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL. METHODS The Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane and DARE databases were searched from 1997 to February 2011. Comparative studies evaluating outcomes from standard versus tubeless PCNL were included. Primary outcome measure...

متن کامل

Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis

BACKGROUND To update a previously published systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS A systematic literature search of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to confirm relevant studies. The scientific literature was screened in accordance with the predetermined inclusion and exclusi...

متن کامل

Comparative Study between Standard and Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE Several recent studies have reported the benefits of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Postoperatively, tubeless PNL patients have an indwelling ureteral stent placed, which is often associated with stent-related morbidity. We have performed totally tubeless (tubeless and stentless) PNL in which no nephrostomy tube or ureteral stent is placed postoperatively. We evaluated the...

متن کامل

The comparison of standard and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures.

PURPOSE To compare totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy procedures on many parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS Percutaneous nephrolitotomy was performed on 195 patients between June 2009 and May 2012. The data of those patients were evaluated retrospectively. Totally tubeless cases were enrolled to Group 1, and Group 2 consisted of non-tubeless cases (re-entry or Foley cath...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2091-0576']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i7.51053